If there’s anything I learned from watching the presidential debates, it’s the importance of acting on gut reactions. I laughed hysterically when I first heard the “binders full of women” line during the debate, and my thought was “this could make a great meme once the debate finishes.” Well I was right about one thing: It made a great meme. But I was totally off about the timing, because by the time the debate finished, there was already a blog dedicated specifically to that one line. Point being, I’ve come to the conclusion that if I’m getting a gut feeling about something, chances are there are quite a few other people feeling it too.
Well today, I got the chance to act on my newfound realization. The LA Times published an article about our newly debuted Designed & Made in LA Logo, and the moment I laid eyes on it (the logo that is), I felt excited for Los Angeles in a way that I never thought I could. I always felt like New York was the only city you could love. Sure, LA has the movie stars and the beaches, but no one walks around talking about how LA is where people go to fall in love, or how LA is the city that never sleeps. We have no focal point; No universal idea that all Angelenos can come together on and feel united. No Times Square, no broadway, no chance encounters on the subway. LA always just seemed like a functional city, where people go when they have a specific purpose that can’t be accomplished elsewhere. But this new logo–and the campaign that backs it–could change all of that.
This is our version of “I <3 NY.” That’s the feeling I got when I saw the winning design, and I know I can’t be the only one feeling it. It’s a movement all Angelenos can be proud of together, and I can’t wait to watch it grow. Having learned my lesson from the debate though, I decided not to just wait and see what happens, but to act on my gut feeling and be a part of the movement myself. So I made a shirt.
I’ve never had a reason to use CafePress before (it always seemed a bit lame), but Designed & Made in LA t-shirts don’t exist yet, so I went and threw one up anyway. Obviously it’s totally illegal, and Youth Monument (the group that Colby Long, the logo’s designer, belongs to) is gonna be pissed and have it taken down when they find out, but I got mine, and if you’re feeling the way I am, like this is the beginning of something huge, then you should grab one too.
The city is finally creating a brand out of itself, and after 24 years of living here, I’m finally able to say I’m excited for Los Angeles.
I never used to value creativity much. Throughout my younger years, “creativity” was a word synonymous with “art,” and seeing as most kids fail to associate art with anything more than paint and crayons, I saw creativity as an extended version of recess, except it was during class time. Art in school was the part where I could legitimately slack off, and no one could say anything about it. I looked forward to being creative for the same reasons I looked forward to watching TV: It was relaxing, I didn’t have to use my brain, and most of all, you couldn’t do it wrong. Art was the easiest ‘A’ of the quarter. Everyone got an ‘A’. And that fact alone was enough to re-enforce what my parents had already begun to impress upon me: In the face of science and technology, art isn’t worth too much. Time spent being creative could be better used solving math problems and running science experiments. Bettering myself.
That’s how I grew up. Sure, my doodles would sometimes end up on the refrigerator, but they never generated the same respect from my parents that a perfect score on a test did. Ten years later (and five years ago), I ventured off to study engineering in college with those very same ideas in my head, and my experiences in there only reaffirmed those beliefs. President Obama has been quoted time and time again promoting awareness of America’s desperate shortage of students pursuing “STEM” Jobs (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics), and our school newspaper had the stats to back up those claims; It seemed like no one studied science. On top of that, the conventional wisdom floating around amongst the freshman poli-sci pontificators was that, “China is going to beat out America in like 10 years dude” and “Those Indians are crazy smart and they work so hard, they’re going to take over fersher.”
Even when spoken like that from a dudebro’s mouth, the argument seems pretty sound. People in other countries, Asia especially, work much harder than we do, and they work on much more technical, STEM-y things. It almost made me mad thinking about it. Americans work days that are 4 hours shorter and weeks that are a whole day shorter, and they work on things that hardly even matter! How could anyone deny we’re falling behind? The evidence is right there in front of us! We’re lazy!
Or so I thought. Then I took a trip to Asia.
My brother had been living in Taipei, Taiwan for nearly a year at the time (this was at the end of this past June), and I figured visiting him was a good excuse to get out and see a new part of the world, so I took two weeks off work and hopped on a plane. It only took a week there for my entire perspective on the situation to change. The interesting part, though, is that it’s not like I was blown away by how wrong my information on Asian culture was–it was actually strikingly accurate. Taiwanese students do indeed spend an enormous number of hours in school each day. My brother had been going to school there as part of an exchange program, and he informed me that his high school started at 7:30am and let out at 5:00pm. He also mentioned that though he didn’t do it, most of the students with any amount of self respect went to additional “cram schools” after regular school, where they studied and memorized everything they might need to know to pass the difficult college entrance exams. So that much was true; Asian students really did work much harder than American ones. (For the record, I also stopped in Hong Kong for a few days and noticed the very same thing.) What I did not anticipate was the social context of it all, and the impact that their relentless emphasis on good grades, high performance, and maximum output has had on their culture.
As much as I loved the people in Taiwan (and don’t get me wrong here, I had a brilliant time there and developed some truly wonderful relationships), there was a quality to nearly all the people there that I can only describe as being similar to that of an airplane on autopilot: They all knew where they were going in life, but rarely did they think to ask why. Very few specifically chose to go where they were going and to do what they were doing. They just sort of followed the path and got there.
I asked several people throughout my trip what kinds of things they recommended doing while I was on the island, and the vast majority of them gave me the same answers as the rest: Go see the Chiang Kai Shek museum. Go to this town and see the waterfall. Eat this food. It was as if they’d all memorized the same bulleted list in a government pamphlet. I have nothing against being a tourist, but none of the people I asked gave me the things that theypersonally liked to do, and the more time I spent there, the more I realized it’s because they themselves don’t know. They spend such an enormous amount of their time in school and doing things for other people that they don’t have any to themselves to develop their character and to learn about what they like to do.
And it wasn’t just in asking for advice that I noticed it. In Taiwan, everyone plays into a role, and if you want to play the “hip young college student” role, you’ve gotta get yourself a camera. And you’d better make sure it’s an SLR, Rebel or better. To them, it’s the item itself that matters, not it’s function. But it seems okay at first, because at least if people are into taking photos, that means they’re showing little signs of creativity, right? Wrong. No one knows what to take pictures of. They just shoot aimlessly at things that move and shine, or even better, they shoot in designated photography locations. One of the days I was there, I visited a geo-park called Yehliu which is famous for its hoodoo stones, incredible rock formations created over thousands of years by the ocean. The park was literally litered with the things, and so my brother and I wandered around for quite some time taking pictures of the stones. When we were ready to leave, we started to head back to the car, but were promptly informed by the family who had taken us there that we shouldn’t leave yet, because we hadn’t taken the “good” picture. The good picture was one in front of a hoodoo stone that had been named “the queen’s head” due to its slight resemblance to, well, a queen’s head. The rock was not particularly better or worse than any of the others, save for two things:
1) It had an official name.
2) It had a sign posted in front of it that said “line for photos starts here.” And I shit you not, it had a designated queueing line for people to stand in before they could take a picture of that particular hoodoo stone, and you better believe that line was a mile long.
The attitude is not “you can do,” it’s “you’re supposed to do,” and no one second guesses it.
I saw this phenomenon throughout the country. Perhaps most amusingly, I noticed that if I were to stand somewhere and take a picture of something, even if that something were comprised largely of nothing (like a blank cement wall), people passing by with cameras would still stop and take a picture of it too, simply because I was doing it. I assume their thought process went something like, “Why would this man be taking a picture if this wasn’t a designated picture-taking spot? He wouldn’t, and therefor this must be something I’m supposed to take a picture of.”
After having made this connection, everything came full circle. All of a sudden, art class in 3rd grade made perfect sense. It wasn’t a waste of time. It couldn’t have been farther from it. 3rd grade art is the reason that I developed the personality I have today. It’s the reason I like both to develop software, and to produce music. It’s the reason that I can aspire to one day be a filmmaker, entrepreneur, and world-famous DJ without being discouraged by the conventional “that’s not what you were trained for” clause. Art gave me the time to think about me, and discover who I am. Despite the fact that I work in software as do many Taiwanese, it’s my creativity that sets my life apart from all the peoples’ whom I met overseas. Creativity gives me the ability to decide what I live for, and what I enjoy. Creativity is the reason that when visitors ask me what to do in LA, my answer doesn’t start and end with The Chinese Theater and the Hollywood Sign. And so I’ve totally flip flopped, because I get it now. Yes, America could still use a significant boost in the STEM department, but by no means should we have to sacrifice our creativity for it. Asia may be ahead in terms of sheer quantity of output, but so much of that output is emulation and copying; Without the creativity they so frequently source from elsewhere, they’d have nothing to produce.
It seems I’m not the first to make this realization. Here’s a brief interview with the former president of National Geographic Films.
One last thing. A few days ago, my brother mentioned to me that he had had an interesting IM conversation with a friend of his who’d been raised in the typical sense by very traditional Chinese parents, and had recently left for college. She now goes to a top tier school on a full ride scholarship, and is studying to go to med school. This is the first significant amount of time she’s ever spent away from home. My brother was kind enough to share an excerpt. This, to me, shows just how much of an impact an upbringing can have on a child’s entire life.
Friend: Midlife crisis….haven’t even reached middle of my life yet. I can’t figure out what i want to do. or what classes to take next year.
everyone’s got a plan…or at least they seem like it. even if they’re not entirely plausible, they have a plan…
Brother: don’t worry so much!
You’re going to be fine!
Friend: what’s my goal in life?
Brother: Figure it out!
Brother: Trial and error
Friend: problem is…i don’t know what i want. or what i like. i just do for the sake of doing and it sucks. so many people here are incredibly passionate about what they like. i’ve got no passion.
pharm could be interesting…i have to learn more
Brother: Watch YouTube videos
Friend: on what?
Brother: Stuff you might be interested in
See if you fall asleep or if you’re like, “THIS IS AWESOME!”
Friend: nothing makes me feel awesome.
i’ve got no passion…..i’m just flesh.
Take from it what you will, but reading this only confirmed the outlook I developed during my trip. Yes, for a student, respect may very well come from academic success, but without the freedom to develop creatively, that success is meaningless. What is the point of working toward goals that mean nothing to you? The people who leave the biggest marks on the world are those who are driven by passion, and just like everything else, passion is a creative art. It must be nurtured, and it must be learned.
I finally get it. As per the new goal I set for myself in my post from a few days ago, I began to do a little research on how Twitter works these days, and how it has changed since the last time I was optimistic enough to think I cared. What I found was eye opening, although not very surprising.
I used to look at the occasional Twitter profile, happen to notice the enormous number of followers the person had, and would immediately become overwhelmed with feelings of inadequacy; This dude, this random new collegegrad like me who seems to have nothing going for him other than cheap sunglasses and an acoustic guitar, has how many followers? Twenty-six thousand!? How is that even possible? Why do people care what this bro-douche has to say? I’ve never felt like I had any shortage of friends in life, but browsing Twitter made me feel like the dudes from Weird Science. The ones that had to program a girlfriend. (Side note: I’m still unclear on how that montage resulted in an animate creature walking out of their closet.) Fortunately for me, though, my days of feeling like the Twitter loner has come to an end, because I’ve been enlightened. Here’s how it really works.
Turns out my my question “Why do people care?” was far more poignant than I ever expected. I guess one day someone realized that having a huge Twitter following made you worth more as an individual, and so he friended every person he could find on the site. I personally never would have gone this route because everyone knows that if you follow more people than people that follow you, you’re automatically a loser. But this guy didn’t care. He followed everyone, and then made two important discoveries.
1. When you follow someone on Twitter, they receive an email letting them know that someone followed them. In most cases, this does nothing, but occasionally, that email is enough to make them want to follow you back.
2. After that email has been sent, there’s nothing to stop you from unfollowing the fool.
True, they could check their list of followers to make sure that you’re still on it, but I think it’s safe to say that the majority of people have no clue that this is going on, and so they’d never think twice about it. And thus, the “Massive Twitter Follower Algorithm” was born. Systematically follow a shit ton of people every day for about 20 minutes, just long enough for an email to be sent, and then unfollow them. 5% of them will follow you in turn, and you don’t look like an idiot for following thousands of people yourself.
The beauty of this algorithm is that it’s not just a theory; It works, and it works damn well. So well in fact that people have written software you can use to completely automate the process for you. It’ll follow thousands of people each day for you, and you don’t even have to remember who to unfollow; it keeps track of it for you, and does it automatically. It even comes with a guide on how to use it with advice like, “Find someone with a big following of users who are similar to the users you want following you, and set their friends list as your target.” It’s genius, it’s effective, and it’s totally sad, because I’m beginning to realize now just how pointless Twitter is. It’s nothing more than a bunch of fools promoting their goods and services to a bunch of other people who don’t care, because they’re too busy promoting their own jazz.
I’ll admit that viewpoint is a bit harsh, but sheesh! If you’re not Ashton Kutcher getting paid all kinds of cash for a 140 character string, is it even worth sorting through all the riffraff?
I’m still setting my goals high. But I’m gonna do it the old fashioned way.
I’ve had many blogs in the past. I used to blog about music over at Uh Oh Disco, and I’ve started various personal blogs since then, all of which have sort of fizzled out. The problem is, my reason for starting a blog is usually that I’ve been motivated by what feels like a stroke of genius at the time, but which often turns out to be less than exciting outside the confines of my own head. Or sometimes I come up with ideas which do actualize well, but which turn out not to warrant an entirely dedicated blog. My favorite example of this is White Noise News, a blog I created as an outlet for all my pent up frustration-turned-satire. The posts I put up were quite well received by the few people who saw them, but there’s only so many untrue news posts one can write before can no longer deny the fact that he’s charting territory that The Onion raped and pillaged years ago.
Point is, other than the fact that this blog happens to be self hosted and tied to my personal website (oooohhh…. ahhhhh…..) there’s no reason that it should be any more successful than the rest–so I’ve decided to set myself some goals to keep things moving.
A few weeks ago I met a girl that operates in a very different way from most people I meet. For the last several years, through Twitter, FourSquare, and I assume a significant number of other social tools, she has digitally documented her life, and as a result, people have developed a genuine interest in what she does, and what she has to say. She has just under 10,000 Twitter followers, and she’s so influential to them that big companies continually reach out to her and offer to pay her to mention, use, and show their products and services. This is strange to me, because I have next to no interest in what almost anyone does on the internet, much less people I don’t even know. How is it possible that people care about what she had for dinner on her date last week? So as a personal goal, and to keep this blog alive, I resolve to find out.
I might not be able to swing 10,000, but as a phase one goal, I’m going to attempt to get 50 people–and not just any people, but specifically people that I don’t know–to care about what I have to say. I haven’t decided whether that’s going to be reflected in Facebook likes, Tweets, comments, or what, but I’ll be sure to let you know as soon as I decide. Sound reasonable? Good